Honduras vs Romania: Wild fish catch from bottom trawling
Honduras
262.15 tonnes
in 2006
Romania
268.64 tonnes
in 2012
Honduras rank
104th
Romania rank
103rd
Wild fish catch from bottom trawling over time
- Honduras
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 268.64 tonnes against 262.15 tonnes in Honduras, a difference of 6.49 tonnes.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Romania ahead.
Honduras ranks 104th and Romania ranks 103rd of 111 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 83.08 tonnes | 3,408 tonnes | 3,325 tonnes | Romania |
| 1970s | 165.39 tonnes | 36,533 tonnes | 36,368 tonnes | Romania |
| 1980s | 4,608 tonnes | 8,518 tonnes | 3,909 tonnes | Romania |
| 1990s | 7,650 tonnes | 4,634 tonnes | 3,015 tonnes | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wild fish catch from bottom trawling, Honduras or Romania?
- Romania, at 268.64 tonnes against 262.15 tonnes in Honduras as of 2012.
- What is the difference in wild fish catch from bottom trawling between Honduras and Romania?
- 6.49 tonnes, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Romania?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 1990.
- How do Honduras and Romania rank globally for wild fish catch from bottom trawling?
- Honduras ranks 104th and Romania ranks 103rd of 111 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Sea Around Us (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Wild fish catch from bottom trawling. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Bottom trawling is a fishing method in which a large, heavy net is dragged along the seafloor to catch fish and other marine life.