Cuba vs Mozambique: Wild fish catch from bottom trawling
Cuba
1,922 tonnes
in 2012
Mozambique
1,887 tonnes
in 1992
Cuba rank
88th
Mozambique rank
89th
Wild fish catch from bottom trawling over time
- Cuba
- Mozambique
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 1,922 tonnes against 1,887 tonnes in Mozambique, a difference of 35 tonnes.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 88th and Mozambique ranks 89th of 111 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 79,546 tonnes | 3,818 tonnes | 75,728 tonnes | Cuba |
| 1980s | 61,714 tonnes | 3,243 tonnes | 58,470 tonnes | Cuba |
| 1990s | 32,260 tonnes | 2,344 tonnes | 29,917 tonnes | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wild fish catch from bottom trawling, Cuba or Mozambique?
- Cuba, at 1,922 tonnes against 1,887 tonnes in Mozambique as of 2012.
- What is the difference in wild fish catch from bottom trawling between Cuba and Mozambique?
- 35 tonnes, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Mozambique?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 1992.
- How do Cuba and Mozambique rank globally for wild fish catch from bottom trawling?
- Cuba ranks 88th and Mozambique ranks 89th of 111 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Sea Around Us (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Wild fish catch from bottom trawling. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Bottom trawling is a fishing method in which a large, heavy net is dragged along the seafloor to catch fish and other marine life.