Congo vs Mozambique: Wild fish catch from bottom trawling
Congo
2,125 tonnes
in 2018
Mozambique
1,887 tonnes
in 1992
Congo rank
87th
Mozambique rank
89th
Wild fish catch from bottom trawling over time
- Congo
- Mozambique
How they compare
Congo currently reports 2,125 tonnes against 1,887 tonnes in Mozambique, a difference of 238 tonnes.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Mozambique's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 16 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 87th and Mozambique ranks 89th of 111 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Mozambique in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 9,727 tonnes | 3,818 tonnes | 5,909 tonnes | Congo |
| 1980s | 5,365 tonnes | 3,243 tonnes | 2,121 tonnes | Congo |
| 1990s | 1,487 tonnes | 2,344 tonnes | 856.78 tonnes | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wild fish catch from bottom trawling, Congo or Mozambique?
- Congo, at 2,125 tonnes against 1,887 tonnes in Mozambique as of 2018.
- What is the difference in wild fish catch from bottom trawling between Congo and Mozambique?
- 238 tonnes, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Mozambique?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 1992.
- How do Congo and Mozambique rank globally for wild fish catch from bottom trawling?
- Congo ranks 87th and Mozambique ranks 89th of 111 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Sea Around Us (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Wild fish catch from bottom trawling. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Bottom trawling is a fishing method in which a large, heavy net is dragged along the seafloor to catch fish and other marine life.