Belize vs Madagascar: Wild fish catch from bottom trawling
Belize
1,289 tonnes
in 2018
Madagascar
1,066 tonnes
in 2018
Belize rank
91st
Madagascar rank
93rd
Wild fish catch from bottom trawling over time
- Belize
- Madagascar
How they compare
Belize currently reports 1,289 tonnes against 1,066 tonnes in Madagascar, a difference of 223 tonnes.
That makes Belize's figure about 1.2 times Madagascar's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belize ahead.
Belize ranks 91st and Madagascar ranks 93rd of 111 countries.
Belize has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 710.17 tonnes | 553.03 tonnes | 157.14 tonnes | Belize |
| 2010s | 2,465 tonnes | 1,122 tonnes | 1,343 tonnes | Belize |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wild fish catch from bottom trawling, Belize or Madagascar?
- Belize, at 1,289 tonnes against 1,066 tonnes in Madagascar as of 2018.
- What is the difference in wild fish catch from bottom trawling between Belize and Madagascar?
- 223 tonnes, with Belize ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Madagascar?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.
- How do Belize and Madagascar rank globally for wild fish catch from bottom trawling?
- Belize ranks 91st and Madagascar ranks 93rd of 111 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Sea Around Us (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Wild fish catch from bottom trawling. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Bottom trawling is a fishing method in which a large, heavy net is dragged along the seafloor to catch fish and other marine life.