Belize vs Cuba: Wild fish catch from bottom trawling
Belize
1,289 tonnes
in 2018
Cuba
1,922 tonnes
in 2012
Belize rank
91st
Cuba rank
88th
Wild fish catch from bottom trawling over time
- Belize
- Cuba
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 1,922 tonnes against 1,289 tonnes in Belize, a difference of 633 tonnes.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.5 times Belize's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Cuba ahead.
Belize ranks 91st and Cuba ranks 88th of 111 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 1 and Cuba in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,597 tonnes | 17,316 tonnes | 13,719 tonnes | Cuba |
| 2000s | 2,566 tonnes | 613.34 tonnes | 1,953 tonnes | Belize |
| 2010s | 1,351 tonnes | 2,403 tonnes | 1,052 tonnes | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wild fish catch from bottom trawling, Belize or Cuba?
- Cuba, at 1,922 tonnes against 1,289 tonnes in Belize as of 2012.
- What is the difference in wild fish catch from bottom trawling between Belize and Cuba?
- 633 tonnes, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Cuba?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2012.
- How do Belize and Cuba rank globally for wild fish catch from bottom trawling?
- Belize ranks 91st and Cuba ranks 88th of 111 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Sea Around Us (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Wild fish catch from bottom trawling. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Bottom trawling is a fishing method in which a large, heavy net is dragged along the seafloor to catch fish and other marine life.