Peru vs South Africa: Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory
Peru
76.0%
in 2022
South Africa
84.5%
in 2021
Peru rank
5th
South Africa rank
2nd
Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Peru
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 84.5% against 76.0% in Peru, a difference of 8.5%.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 5th and South Africa ranks 2nd of 31 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 80.2% | 69.9% | 10.4% | Peru |
| 2020s | 77.9% | 87.8% | 10.0% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory, Peru or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 84.5% against 76.0% in Peru as of 2021.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory between Peru and South Africa?
- 8.5%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and South Africa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2021.
- How do Peru and South Africa rank globally for benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory?
- Peru ranks 5th and South Africa ranks 2nd of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the richestquintile relative to the total benefits going to the population