Chile vs Kyrgyzstan: Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory
Chile
29.2%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
30.9%
in 2020
Chile rank
24th
Kyrgyzstan rank
21st
Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Chile
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 30.9% against 29.2% in Chile, a difference of 1.7%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 24th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 21st of 31 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42.5% | 40.0% | 2.5% | Chile |
| 2010s | 47.5% | 30.6% | 16.9% | Chile |
| 2020s | 43.6% | 30.9% | 12.7% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory, Chile or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 30.9% against 29.2% in Chile as of 2020.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory between Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 1.7%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory?
- Chile ranks 24th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 21st of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the richestquintile relative to the total benefits going to the population