Kyrgyzstan vs Poland: Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private
Kyrgyzstan
41.4%
in 2020
Poland
42.4%
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan rank
12th
Poland rank
11th
Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 42.4% against 41.4% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 12th and Poland ranks 11th of 36 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42.1% | 41.7% | 0.4% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 38.0% | 39.1% | 1.1% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private, Kyrgyzstan or Poland?
- Poland, at 42.4% against 41.4% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private between Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 1.0%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Poland rank globally for benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 12th and Poland ranks 11th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the richestquintile relative to the total benefits going to the population