Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) vs Kyrgyzstan: Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
41.5%
in 2017
Kyrgyzstan
46.2%
in 2020
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank
12th
Kyrgyzstan rank
9th
Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private over time
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 46.2% against 41.5% in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), a difference of 4.7%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)'s.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 12th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 9th of 36 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.2% | 44.7% | 3.6% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 40.0% | 41.2% | 1.2% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private, Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 46.2% against 41.5% in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) as of 2020.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private between Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Kyrgyzstan?
- 4.7%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
- How do Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 12th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 9th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the richestquintile relative to the total benefits going to the population