Mongolia vs Poland: Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban
Mongolia
23.9%
in 2020
Poland
25.6%
in 2019
Mongolia rank
7th
Poland rank
4th
Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban over time
- Mongolia
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 25.6% against 23.9% in Mongolia, a difference of 1.7%.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 7th and Poland ranks 4th of 34 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.2% | 27.9% | 4.7% | Poland |
| 2010s | 23.1% | 26.9% | 3.8% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban, Mongolia or Poland?
- Poland, at 25.6% against 23.9% in Mongolia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban between Mongolia and Poland?
- 1.7%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Poland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
- How do Mongolia and Poland rank globally for benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban?
- Mongolia ranks 7th and Poland ranks 4th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the fourth quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population