Argentina vs Poland: Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban
Argentina
25.4%
in 2022
Poland
25.6%
in 2019
Argentina rank
5th
Poland rank
4th
Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban over time
- Argentina
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 25.6% against 25.4% in Argentina, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Poland ahead.
Argentina ranks 5th and Poland ranks 4th of 34 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.5% | 28.3% | 1.8% | Poland |
| 2010s | 24.1% | 26.3% | 2.1% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban, Argentina or Poland?
- Poland, at 25.6% against 25.4% in Argentina as of 2019.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban between Argentina and Poland?
- 0.2%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Poland?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Argentina and Poland rank globally for benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban?
- Argentina ranks 5th and Poland ranks 4th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the fourth quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population