Mongolia vs Uruguay: Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Mongolia
30.0%
in 2020
Uruguay
26.5%
in 2022
Mongolia rank
3rd
Uruguay rank
5th
Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural over time
- Mongolia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 30.0% against 26.5% in Uruguay, a difference of 3.5%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Uruguay's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Uruguay ahead.
Mongolia ranks 3rd and Uruguay ranks 5th of 30 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.9% | 25.2% | 1.3% | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 24.7% | 27.2% | 2.5% | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 30.0% | 27.3% | 2.7% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural, Mongolia or Uruguay?
- Mongolia, at 30.0% against 26.5% in Uruguay as of 2020.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural between Mongolia and Uruguay?
- 3.5%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Uruguay?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Uruguay rank globally for benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural?
- Mongolia ranks 3rd and Uruguay ranks 5th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the fourth quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population