Brazil vs Mongolia: Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Brazil
32.1%
in 2022
Mongolia
30.0%
in 2020
Brazil rank
1st
Mongolia rank
3rd
Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural over time
- Brazil
- Mongolia
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 32.1% against 30.0% in Mongolia, a difference of 2.1%.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 1st and Mongolia ranks 3rd of 31 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.5% | 23.9% | 1.6% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 26.7% | 24.7% | 1.9% | Brazil |
| 2020s | 25.6% | 30.0% | 4.4% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural, Brazil or Mongolia?
- Brazil, at 32.1% against 30.0% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural between Brazil and Mongolia?
- 2.1%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Mongolia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and Mongolia rank globally for benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural?
- Brazil ranks 1st and Mongolia ranks 3rd of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the fourth quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population