Chile vs Kyrgyzstan: Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban
Chile
17.7%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
17.6%
in 2020
Chile rank
33rd
Kyrgyzstan rank
34th
Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban over time
- Chile
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Chile currently reports 17.7% against 17.6% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Chile ranks 33rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 34th of 36 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 17.8% | 23.1% | 5.2% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 17.6% | 17.6% | 0.0% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers -urban, Chile or Kyrgyzstan?
- Chile, at 17.7% against 17.6% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers -urban between Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.1%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers -urban?
- Chile ranks 33rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 34th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the fourth quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population