Chile vs Kyrgyzstan: Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Chile
16.6%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
18.0%
in 2020
Chile rank
35th
Kyrgyzstan rank
32nd
Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural over time
- Chile
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 18.0% against 16.6% in Chile, a difference of 1.4%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 35th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 32nd of 35 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 18.5% | 19.7% | 1.2% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 21.5% | 18.0% | 3.5% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural, Chile or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 18.0% against 16.6% in Chile as of 2020.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural between Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 1.4%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural?
- Chile ranks 35th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 32nd of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the fourth quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population