Chile vs Kyrgyzstan: Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Chile
18.8%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
19.0%
in 2020
Chile rank
33rd
Kyrgyzstan rank
30th
Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Chile
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 19.0% against 18.8% in Chile, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 33rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 30th of 36 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 18.0% | 19.2% | 1.2% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 17.9% | 19.0% | 1.1% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers, Chile or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 19.0% against 18.8% in Chile as of 2020.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers between Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.2%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Chile ranks 33rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 30th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the fourth quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population