Mongolia vs Viet Nam: Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Mongolia
17.3%
in 2020
Viet Nam
15.6%
in 2020
Mongolia rank
13th
Viet Nam rank
15th
Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural over time
- Mongolia
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 17.3% against 15.6% in Viet Nam, a difference of 1.7%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Viet Nam's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 13th and Viet Nam ranks 15th of 31 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 19.6% | 15.4% | 4.2% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 17.3% | 15.6% | 1.7% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural, Mongolia or Viet Nam?
- Mongolia, at 17.3% against 15.6% in Viet Nam as of 2020.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural between Mongolia and Viet Nam?
- 1.7%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Viet Nam?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Viet Nam rank globally for benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural?
- Mongolia ranks 13th and Viet Nam ranks 15th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the third quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population