Mongolia vs Poland: Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Mongolia
17.3%
in 2020
Poland
18.7%
in 2019
Mongolia rank
12th
Poland rank
10th
Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural over time
- Mongolia
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 18.7% against 17.3% in Mongolia, a difference of 1.4%.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Poland ahead.
Mongolia ranks 12th and Poland ranks 10th of 30 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.6% | 18.9% | 0.7% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 19.0% | 17.9% | 1.1% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural, Mongolia or Poland?
- Poland, at 18.7% against 17.3% in Mongolia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural between Mongolia and Poland?
- 1.4%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Poland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
- How do Mongolia and Poland rank globally for benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural?
- Mongolia ranks 12th and Poland ranks 10th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the third quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population