Kyrgyzstan vs Romania: Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Kyrgyzstan
13.6%
in 2020
Romania
13.7%
in 2021
Kyrgyzstan rank
30th
Romania rank
29th
Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 13.7% against 13.6% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 30th and Romania ranks 29th of 35 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 11.5% | 17.0% | 5.5% | Romania |
| 2020s | 13.6% | 16.2% | 2.6% | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural, Kyrgyzstan or Romania?
- Romania, at 13.7% against 13.6% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural between Kyrgyzstan and Romania?
- 0.1%, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Romania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Romania rank globally for benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 30th and Romania ranks 29th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the third quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population