Brazil vs South Africa: Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Brazil
22.0%
in 2022
South Africa
23.6%
in 2021
Brazil rank
4th
South Africa rank
3rd
Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural over time
- Brazil
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 23.6% against 22.0% in Brazil, a difference of 1.6%.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was South Africa ahead.
Brazil ranks 4th and South Africa ranks 3rd of 35 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 17.6% | 20.2% | 2.6% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 19.2% | 23.9% | 4.7% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural, Brazil or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 23.6% against 22.0% in Brazil as of 2021.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural between Brazil and South Africa?
- 1.6%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Brazil and South Africa rank globally for benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural?
- Brazil ranks 4th and South Africa ranks 3rd of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the third quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population