Brazil vs Serbia: Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Brazil
22.0%
in 2022
Serbia
27.5%
in 2022
Brazil rank
4th
Serbia rank
1st
Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural over time
- Brazil
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 27.5% against 22.0% in Brazil, a difference of 5.5%.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.2 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 4th and Serbia ranks 1st of 35 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 20.1% | 20.1% | 0.0% | Brazil |
| 2020s | 21.2% | 21.8% | 0.6% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural, Brazil or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 27.5% against 22.0% in Brazil as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural between Brazil and Serbia?
- 5.5%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2022.
- How do Brazil and Serbia rank globally for benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural?
- Brazil ranks 4th and Serbia ranks 1st of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the third quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population