Belarus vs Kyrgyzstan: Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Belarus
13.8%
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan
13.6%
in 2020
Belarus rank
28th
Kyrgyzstan rank
30th
Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural over time
- Belarus
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 13.8% against 13.6% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 28th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 30th of 35 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural, Belarus or Kyrgyzstan?
- Belarus, at 13.8% against 13.6% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural between Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.2%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural?
- Belarus ranks 28th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 30th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the third quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population