Kazakhstan, Republic of vs Mongolia: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Kazakhstan, Republic of
10.9%
in 2021
Mongolia
11.2%
in 2020
Kazakhstan, Republic of rank
12th
Mongolia rank
11th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Kazakhstan, Republic of
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 11.2% against 10.9% in Kazakhstan, Republic of, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Kazakhstan, Republic of ahead.
Kazakhstan, Republic of ranks 12th and Mongolia ranks 11th of 33 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kazakhstan, Republic of averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan, Republic of | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.6% | 14.9% | 0.7% | Kazakhstan, Republic of |
| 2010s | 12.3% | 15.5% | 3.2% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 10.5% | 11.2% | 0.7% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Kazakhstan, Republic of or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 11.2% against 10.9% in Kazakhstan, Republic of as of 2020.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Kazakhstan, Republic of and Mongolia?
- 0.3%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan, Republic of and Mongolia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Kazakhstan, Republic of and Mongolia rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Kazakhstan, Republic of ranks 12th and Mongolia ranks 11th of 33 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population