Kyrgyzstan vs Poland: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban
Kyrgyzstan
14.0%
in 2020
Poland
15.6%
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan rank
10th
Poland rank
9th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 15.6% against 14.0% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 1.6%.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th and Poland ranks 9th of 34 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20.8% | 12.6% | 8.2% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 15.1% | 14.7% | 0.4% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban, Kyrgyzstan or Poland?
- Poland, at 15.6% against 14.0% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban between Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 1.6%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Poland rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th and Poland ranks 9th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population