Dominican Republic vs Panama: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban
Dominican Republic
4.5%
in 2021
Panama
4.9%
in 2023
Dominican Republic rank
27th
Panama rank
25th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban over time
- Dominican Republic
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 4.9% against 4.5% in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0.4%.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Dominican Republic's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Dominican Republic ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 27th and Panama ranks 25th of 34 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 2 and Panama in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.6% | 4.0% | 2.6% | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 5.4% | 5.3% | 0.1% | Dominican Republic |
| 2020s | 4.5% | 4.7% | 0.2% | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban, Dominican Republic or Panama?
- Panama, at 4.9% against 4.5% in Dominican Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban between Dominican Republic and Panama?
- 0.4%, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Panama?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2021.
- How do Dominican Republic and Panama rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban?
- Dominican Republic ranks 27th and Panama ranks 25th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population