Dominican Republic vs Pakistan: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban
Dominican Republic
4.5%
in 2021
Pakistan
4.2%
in 2018
Dominican Republic rank
27th
Pakistan rank
28th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban over time
- Dominican Republic
- Pakistan
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 4.5% against 4.2% in Pakistan, a difference of 0.3%.
That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.1 times Pakistan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Pakistan ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 27th and Pakistan ranks 28th of 34 countries.
Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.5% | 5.9% | 0.5% | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 5.3% | 4.4% | 0.9% | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban, Dominican Republic or Pakistan?
- Dominican Republic, at 4.5% against 4.2% in Pakistan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban between Dominican Republic and Pakistan?
- 0.3%, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Pakistan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Dominican Republic and Pakistan rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban?
- Dominican Republic ranks 27th and Pakistan ranks 28th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population