Chile vs Poland: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban
Chile
13.7%
in 2022
Poland
15.6%
in 2019
Chile rank
11th
Poland rank
9th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban over time
- Chile
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 15.6% against 13.7% in Chile, a difference of 1.9%.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 11th and Poland ranks 9th of 34 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.9% | 13.3% | 2.3% | Poland |
| 2010s | 8.3% | 14.6% | 6.2% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban, Chile or Poland?
- Poland, at 15.6% against 13.7% in Chile as of 2019.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban between Chile and Poland?
- 1.9%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Poland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
- How do Chile and Poland rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban?
- Chile ranks 11th and Poland ranks 9th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population