Chile vs Kyrgyzstan: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban
Chile
13.7%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
14.0%
in 2020
Chile rank
11th
Kyrgyzstan rank
10th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban over time
- Chile
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 14.0% against 13.7% in Chile, a difference of 0.3%.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 11th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th of 34 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.6% | 20.8% | 10.1% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 8.6% | 15.2% | 6.6% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 9.1% | 14.0% | 5.0% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban, Chile or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 14.0% against 13.7% in Chile as of 2020.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban between Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.3%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban?
- Chile ranks 11th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population