Mongolia vs Viet Nam: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Mongolia
9.9%
in 2020
Viet Nam
12.2%
in 2020
Mongolia rank
16th
Viet Nam rank
13th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural over time
- Mongolia
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 12.2% against 9.9% in Mongolia, a difference of 2.3%.
That makes Viet Nam's figure about 1.2 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 16th and Viet Nam ranks 13th of 31 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and Viet Nam in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 13.6% | 6.5% | 7.1% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 9.9% | 12.2% | 2.3% | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural, Mongolia or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 12.2% against 9.9% in Mongolia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural between Mongolia and Viet Nam?
- 2.3%, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Viet Nam?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Viet Nam rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural?
- Mongolia ranks 16th and Viet Nam ranks 13th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population