Mongolia vs Uruguay: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Mongolia
9.9%
in 2020
Uruguay
12.0%
in 2022
Mongolia rank
15th
Uruguay rank
13th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural over time
- Mongolia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 12.0% against 9.9% in Mongolia, a difference of 2.1%.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.2 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 15th and Uruguay ranks 13th of 30 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.4% | 10.3% | 7.1% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 13.1% | 12.3% | 0.7% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 9.9% | 8.4% | 1.5% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural, Mongolia or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 12.0% against 9.9% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural between Mongolia and Uruguay?
- 2.1%, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Uruguay?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Uruguay rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural?
- Mongolia ranks 15th and Uruguay ranks 13th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population