Kyrgyzstan vs Poland: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Kyrgyzstan
15.8%
in 2020
Poland
15.5%
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan rank
7th
Poland rank
8th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Poland
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 15.8% against 15.5% in Poland, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Poland ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 7th and Poland ranks 8th of 31 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.3% | 13.2% | 2.8% | Poland |
| 2010s | 15.0% | 14.8% | 0.2% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural, Kyrgyzstan or Poland?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 15.8% against 15.5% in Poland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural between Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 0.3%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Poland rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 7th and Poland ranks 8th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population