Kazakhstan vs Poland: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Kazakhstan
12.9%
in 2021
Poland
15.5%
in 2019
Kazakhstan rank
10th
Poland rank
8th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural over time
- Kazakhstan
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 15.5% against 12.9% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 2.6%.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.2 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 10th and Poland ranks 8th of 31 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.5% | 14.2% | 0.3% | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 13.6% | 15.0% | 1.4% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural, Kazakhstan or Poland?
- Poland, at 15.5% against 12.9% in Kazakhstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural between Kazakhstan and Poland?
- 2.6%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Poland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2019.
- How do Kazakhstan and Poland rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural?
- Kazakhstan ranks 10th and Poland ranks 8th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population