El Salvador vs Mongolia: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
El Salvador
8.4%
in 2022
Mongolia
9.9%
in 2020
El Salvador rank
17th
Mongolia rank
16th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural over time
- El Salvador
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 9.9% against 8.4% in El Salvador, a difference of 1.5%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.2 times El Salvador's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
El Salvador ranks 17th and Mongolia ranks 16th of 31 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.1% | 15.7% | 12.6% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 5.9% | 13.1% | 7.2% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural, El Salvador or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 9.9% against 8.4% in El Salvador as of 2020.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural between El Salvador and Mongolia?
- 1.5%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Mongolia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do El Salvador and Mongolia rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural?
- El Salvador ranks 17th and Mongolia ranks 16th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population