Costa Rica vs Mongolia: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Costa Rica
6.5%
in 2022
Mongolia
9.9%
in 2020
Costa Rica rank
19th
Mongolia rank
16th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural over time
- Costa Rica
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 9.9% against 6.5% in Costa Rica, a difference of 3.4%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.5 times Costa Rica's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 19th and Mongolia ranks 16th of 31 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 6.8% | 13.1% | 6.3% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 5.7% | 9.9% | 4.3% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural, Costa Rica or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 9.9% against 6.5% in Costa Rica as of 2020.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural between Costa Rica and Mongolia?
- 3.4%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Mongolia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Mongolia rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural?
- Costa Rica ranks 19th and Mongolia ranks 16th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population