Armenia vs Poland: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Armenia
17.3%
in 2022
Poland
15.5%
in 2019
Armenia rank
6th
Poland rank
8th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural over time
- Armenia
- Poland
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 17.3% against 15.5% in Poland, a difference of 1.8%.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.1 times Poland's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Armenia has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 6th and Poland ranks 8th of 31 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.1% | 14.6% | 2.5% | Armenia |
| 2010s | 18.5% | 14.7% | 3.7% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural, Armenia or Poland?
- Armenia, at 17.3% against 15.5% in Poland as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural between Armenia and Poland?
- 1.8%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Poland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Armenia and Poland rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural?
- Armenia ranks 6th and Poland ranks 8th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population