Mongolia vs Poland: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Mongolia
18.8%
in 2020
Poland
22.3%
in 2019
Mongolia rank
9th
Poland rank
5th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Mongolia
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 22.3% against 18.8% in Mongolia, a difference of 3.5%.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.2 times Mongolia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 9th and Poland ranks 5th of 33 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.8% | 21.5% | 3.7% | Poland |
| 2010s | 18.3% | 21.5% | 3.1% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Mongolia or Poland?
- Poland, at 22.3% against 18.8% in Mongolia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Mongolia and Poland?
- 3.5%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Poland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
- How do Mongolia and Poland rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Mongolia ranks 9th and Poland ranks 5th of 33 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population