Serbia vs Uruguay: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Serbia
16.8%
in 2022
Uruguay
16.6%
in 2022
Serbia rank
4th
Uruguay rank
5th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Serbia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 16.8% against 16.6% in Uruguay, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Serbia ahead.
Serbia ranks 4th and Uruguay ranks 5th of 36 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 15.6% | 15.0% | 0.6% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 15.0% | 16.1% | 1.1% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers, Serbia or Uruguay?
- Serbia, at 16.8% against 16.6% in Uruguay as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers between Serbia and Uruguay?
- 0.2%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Uruguay?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Serbia and Uruguay rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Serbia ranks 4th and Uruguay ranks 5th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population