Peru vs Serbia: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Peru
16.3%
in 2022
Serbia
16.8%
in 2022
Peru rank
6th
Serbia rank
4th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Peru
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 16.8% against 16.3% in Peru, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Serbia ahead.
Peru ranks 6th and Serbia ranks 4th of 36 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 11.5% | 14.9% | 3.4% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 16.3% | 15.0% | 1.3% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers, Peru or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 16.8% against 16.3% in Peru as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers between Peru and Serbia?
- 0.5%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Serbia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Peru and Serbia rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Peru ranks 6th and Serbia ranks 4th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population