South Africa vs Uruguay: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban
South Africa
21.0%
in 2021
Uruguay
17.1%
in 2022
South Africa rank
2nd
Uruguay rank
4th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban over time
- South Africa
- Uruguay
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 21.0% against 17.1% in Uruguay, a difference of 3.9%.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.2 times Uruguay's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Uruguay ahead.
South Africa ranks 2nd and Uruguay ranks 4th of 36 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 16.8% | 15.1% | 1.6% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 18.9% | 15.9% | 2.9% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -urban, South Africa or Uruguay?
- South Africa, at 21.0% against 17.1% in Uruguay as of 2021.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -urban between South Africa and Uruguay?
- 3.9%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Uruguay?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do South Africa and Uruguay rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -urban?
- South Africa ranks 2nd and Uruguay ranks 4th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population