Belarus vs Ecuador: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban
Belarus
16.8%
in 2019
Ecuador
16.4%
in 2022
Belarus rank
6th
Ecuador rank
9th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban over time
- Belarus
- Ecuador
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 16.8% against 16.4% in Ecuador, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 6th and Ecuador ranks 9th of 36 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.5% | 10.8% | 3.7% | Belarus |
| 2010s | 15.2% | 14.7% | 0.5% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -urban, Belarus or Ecuador?
- Belarus, at 16.8% against 16.4% in Ecuador as of 2019.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -urban between Belarus and Ecuador?
- 0.4%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Ecuador?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Ecuador rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -urban?
- Belarus ranks 6th and Ecuador ranks 9th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population