Belarus vs Costa Rica: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban
Belarus
16.8%
in 2019
Costa Rica
16.9%
in 2022
Belarus rank
6th
Costa Rica rank
5th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban over time
- Belarus
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 16.9% against 16.8% in Belarus, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Belarus ranks 6th and Costa Rica ranks 5th of 36 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Costa Rica in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.5% | 15.2% | 0.7% | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 15.2% | 14.3% | 0.9% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -urban, Belarus or Costa Rica?
- Costa Rica, at 16.9% against 16.8% in Belarus as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -urban between Belarus and Costa Rica?
- 0.1%, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Costa Rica?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Costa Rica rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -urban?
- Belarus ranks 6th and Costa Rica ranks 5th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population