Argentina vs Serbia: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban
Argentina
15.9%
in 2022
Serbia
16.1%
in 2022
Argentina rank
12th
Serbia rank
11th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban over time
- Argentina
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 16.1% against 15.9% in Argentina, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Serbia ahead.
Argentina ranks 12th and Serbia ranks 11th of 36 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 13.2% | 15.3% | 2.1% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 17.1% | 17.2% | 0.1% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -urban, Argentina or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 16.1% against 15.9% in Argentina as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -urban between Argentina and Serbia?
- 0.2%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Serbia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Argentina and Serbia rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -urban?
- Argentina ranks 12th and Serbia ranks 11th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population