Peru vs Romania: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Peru
14.7%
in 2022
Romania
14.1%
in 2021
Peru rank
13th
Romania rank
15th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural over time
- Peru
- Romania
How they compare
Peru currently reports 14.7% against 14.1% in Romania, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 13th and Romania ranks 15th of 35 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.4% | 7.8% | 0.5% | Peru |
| 2010s | 10.6% | 12.0% | 1.3% | Romania |
| 2020s | 9.9% | 16.0% | 6.0% | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural, Peru or Romania?
- Peru, at 14.7% against 14.1% in Romania as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural between Peru and Romania?
- 0.6%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Romania?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2021.
- How do Peru and Romania rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural?
- Peru ranks 13th and Romania ranks 15th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population