Paraguay vs Serbia: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Paraguay
16.9%
in 2022
Serbia
16.0%
in 2022
Paraguay rank
4th
Serbia rank
7th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural over time
- Paraguay
- Serbia
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 16.9% against 16.0% in Serbia, a difference of 0.9%.
That makes Paraguay's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Paraguay has been ahead every year.
Paraguay ranks 4th and Serbia ranks 7th of 35 countries.
Paraguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Paraguay | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.5% | 10.0% | 0.6% | Paraguay |
| 2010s | 14.7% | 8.8% | 5.8% | Paraguay |
| 2020s | 16.9% | 14.8% | 2.0% | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural, Paraguay or Serbia?
- Paraguay, at 16.9% against 16.0% in Serbia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural between Paraguay and Serbia?
- 0.9%, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Serbia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2022.
- How do Paraguay and Serbia rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural?
- Paraguay ranks 4th and Serbia ranks 7th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population