Kyrgyzstan vs Viet Nam: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Kyrgyzstan
9.6%
in 2020
Viet Nam
9.4%
in 2020
Kyrgyzstan rank
29th
Viet Nam rank
30th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 9.6% against 9.4% in Viet Nam, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Viet Nam ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 29th and Viet Nam ranks 30th of 35 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 2 and Viet Nam in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.8% | 9.2% | 0.4% | Viet Nam |
| 2010s | 11.8% | 6.4% | 5.4% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 9.6% | 9.4% | 0.2% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural, Kyrgyzstan or Viet Nam?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 9.6% against 9.4% in Viet Nam as of 2020.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural between Kyrgyzstan and Viet Nam?
- 0.2%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Viet Nam?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Viet Nam rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 29th and Viet Nam ranks 30th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population