Kyrgyzstan vs Panama: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Kyrgyzstan
9.6%
in 2020
Panama
11.3%
in 2023
Kyrgyzstan rank
29th
Panama rank
28th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 11.3% against 9.6% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 1.7%.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.2 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Panama ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 29th and Panama ranks 28th of 35 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural, Kyrgyzstan or Panama?
- Panama, at 11.3% against 9.6% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural between Kyrgyzstan and Panama?
- 1.7%, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Panama?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Panama rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 29th and Panama ranks 28th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population