Kosovo vs Kyrgyzstan: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Kosovo
11.4%
in 2017
Kyrgyzstan
9.6%
in 2020
Kosovo rank
26th
Kyrgyzstan rank
29th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural over time
- Kosovo
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kosovo currently reports 11.4% against 9.6% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 1.8%.
That makes Kosovo's figure about 1.2 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kosovo ahead.
Kosovo ranks 26th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 29th of 35 countries.
Kosovo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.3% | 8.8% | 6.4% | Kosovo |
| 2010s | 12.9% | 12.3% | 0.7% | Kosovo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural, Kosovo or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kosovo, at 11.4% against 9.6% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2017.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural between Kosovo and Kyrgyzstan?
- 1.8%, with Kosovo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
- How do Kosovo and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural?
- Kosovo ranks 26th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 29th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population