El Salvador vs Romania: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
El Salvador
13.7%
in 2022
Romania
14.1%
in 2021
El Salvador rank
16th
Romania rank
15th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural over time
- El Salvador
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 14.1% against 13.7% in El Salvador, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2008 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 16th and Romania ranks 15th of 35 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.4% | 7.8% | 2.5% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 9.9% | 12.0% | 2.1% | Romania |
| 2020s | 11.5% | 14.1% | 2.7% | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural, El Salvador or Romania?
- Romania, at 14.1% against 13.7% in El Salvador as of 2021.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural between El Salvador and Romania?
- 0.4%, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Romania?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2021.
- How do El Salvador and Romania rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural?
- El Salvador ranks 16th and Romania ranks 15th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population