El Salvador vs Peru: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
El Salvador
13.7%
in 2022
Peru
14.7%
in 2022
El Salvador rank
16th
Peru rank
13th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural over time
- El Salvador
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 14.7% against 13.7% in El Salvador, a difference of 1.0%.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2008 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 16th and Peru ranks 13th of 35 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.2% | 10.2% | 0.1% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 10.6% | 10.7% | 0.2% | Peru |
| 2020s | 12.6% | 13.3% | 0.7% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural, El Salvador or Peru?
- Peru, at 14.7% against 13.7% in El Salvador as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural between El Salvador and Peru?
- 1.0%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Peru?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
- How do El Salvador and Peru rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural?
- El Salvador ranks 16th and Peru ranks 13th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population