Ecuador vs South Africa: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Ecuador
13.6%
in 2022
South Africa
13.6%
in 2021
Ecuador rank
19th
South Africa rank
18th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural over time
- Ecuador
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 13.6% against 13.6% in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was South Africa ahead.
Ecuador ranks 19th and South Africa ranks 18th of 35 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 14.5% | 16.4% | 2.0% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 14.2% | 14.7% | 0.5% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural, Ecuador or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 13.6% against 13.6% in Ecuador as of 2021.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural between Ecuador and South Africa?
- 0.0%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Ecuador and South Africa rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural?
- Ecuador ranks 19th and South Africa ranks 18th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population